Deputy President Geoffrey Rigathi Gachagua has denied having any knowledge about the Adani deal that has caused a stir in Kenya. The deal, involving the Adani Group from India, has faced heavy criticism for the way it was handled.
Gachagua, despite being the second most powerful figure in the country’s leadership, claims he was not involved in discussions about the deal.
During a recent interview, Gachagua insisted that the Adani deal never reached the Cabinet Committee for review or approval. He stated, “The Adani deal never came before the Cabinet Committee.
I was never informed, nor was it ever a subject of our deliberations.” His comments suggest that some members of the government may have been kept in the dark about important decisions being made.
This denial comes at a time when many Kenyans are questioning the transparency of the Kenya Kwanza (KK) administration, led by President William Ruto. Gachagua’s statement adds another layer of uncertainty as people try to understand how such a major deal was approved without full government participation.
The Adani Group, an Indian multinational corporation, has been involved in various infrastructure projects in Kenya. However, critics of the deal are concerned that the proper procedures were not followed when awarding contracts to the company.
Many Kenyans have been following this case closely, as it involves significant infrastructure projects that will impact the country’s future. Some citizens believe that the deal was rushed through, ignoring standard government processes, which should have included input from the Cabinet Committee.
Although Gachagua’s remarks seem to agree with these concerns, they have also led to confusion. As Deputy President, Gachagua has an important role in the government, including overseeing and making key decisions. His admission that he was unaware of the Adani deal raises questions about how the government operates and the transparency of the decision-making process.
Several political analysts have weighed in on the situation. Some argue that Gachagua’s statement might be an attempt to distance himself from the controversy. Others, however, believe that it highlights possible divisions or a lack of communication within President Ruto’s administration.
The lack of clear information about the deal has fueled speculation. Was the Cabinet intentionally kept in the dark? Or were only a few top officials involved in approving the Adani deal? These questions remain unanswered, and the Kenyan public is eager to hear more details.
Meanwhile, Gachagua’s comments have raised concerns not only about the Adani deal but also about the overall transparency of the government.
Some are worried that if senior officials like the Deputy President are not being informed about critical matters, it may reflect larger issues within the administration.
0 Comments