The conflict began when Deputy President Gachagua publicly urged Sakaja to engage with Marikiti traders before moving them to the new Wakulima Market on Kangundo Road. Gachagua's call for consultation aimed to ensure that the traders' interests and concerns were taken into account before any relocation took place. He suggested that a decision of this nature should involve discussions with the affected parties to address their needs and preferences.
Governor Sakaja responded to Gachagua's public comments with a sharp rebuke. In a statement, Sakaja indicated that such matters should be handled privately rather than through public social media exchanges. He pointedly remarked, "You have my number," implying that direct communication would be more effective and appropriate for resolving such issues.
The exchange between Sakaja and Gachagua has sparked a wave of reactions from Kenyans, reflecting a range of opinions about the situation:
Some Kenyans expressed frustration with the public nature of the disagreement. Zigzag, a commenter, criticized the leaders for airing their grievances in public, suggesting that such issues should be resolved out of the public eye, especially when they involve the governing party.
Suspicion of Political Maneuvering: Mauti Dennilson voiced skepticism about the authenticity of the conflict, implying that it could be a staged political maneuver.
According to Dennilson, the dispute might be a strategic move by the UDA (United Democratic Alliance) to create a spectacle, leaving ordinary citizens feeling left out and powerless.
Other reactions were more supportive of Sakaja’s stance. Johnson, another commenter, defended Sakaja’s position, suggesting that Gachagua should focus on addressing issues with MPs from Central Kenya rather than publicly criticizing Sakaja.
Similarly, Karanja Harrison supported Sakaja, criticizing Gachagua for his past actions and suggesting that the Deputy President’s arrogance was evident in his approach.
Some respondents, like Bethuel Kipleting, agreed with Sakaja’s view that Gachagua should have handled the matter privately. They felt that publicizing the disagreement was unnecessary and that Gachagua should have contacted Sakaja directly to resolve the issue.
Timbo highlighted the role of social media in empowering individuals to express their views more boldly. This perspective suggests that Sakaja’s public response was influenced by the platform's capacity to amplify voices and engage a wider audience.
Lucky Paul criticized both Sakaja and Gachagua for their handling of the situation, suggesting that publishing grievances on social media was counterproductive. He argued that it would be wiser for leaders to communicate privately rather than engaging in public disputes.
Kennedy Mbugua took a different view, questioning why Gachagua’s request for consultation was being criticized. Mbugua argued that Gachagua’s suggestion was reasonable and intended to ensure that the relocation process was handled with consideration for the traders’ well-being.
2 Comments
very nice elaboration
ReplyDelete🔥🔥🔥
Delete