Karua had been selected to represent veteran Ugandan opposition leader Kizza Besigye and his associate Haji Obeid Lutale, who are facing charges of unlawful possession of firearms and ammunition before a military court in Kampala.
The ULC justified its decision by citing procedural flaws in Karua’s application, including a lack of notarization on her practicing certificate and a letter of good standing from the Law Society of Kenya (LSK).
However, the LSK and the East Africa Law Society (EALS) strongly criticized the ULC, accusing it of undermining cross-border legal cooperation and violating regional agreements.
In its statement, the LSK expressed disappointment, labeling the decision as high-handed and disrespectful to Kenyan legal professionals.
It pointed out that Kenya has always extended professional courtesy and recognition to Ugandan lawyers practicing within its borders, a gesture it claimed was not being reciprocated.
The LSK warned that if such actions persisted, Kenya might consider halting the admission of Ugandan advocates to its bar, a move aimed at protecting the dignity of Kenyan legal practice.
The EALS echoed similar sentiments, emphasizing that the ULC’s actions were a breach of internationally recognized legal standards.
The regional body highlighted the potential implications on the rights of accused persons, who are entitled to legal representation by their chosen counsel.
The EALS also warned that the decision could set a dangerous precedent, eroding public confidence in judicial processes and compromising judicial independence across East Africa.
Both organizations have vowed to challenge the ULC’s actions, with the EALS asserting that it will pursue the matter to safeguard the principles of justice and fair trial in the region.
Post a Comment
0Comments